Tuesday 9 September 2008

Sorting a Generic List in C#

Using Sort algorithm was pretty tedious for asp.net versions prior to 2.0, and also in ASP3.0. But ASP.Net 2.0 onwards we have a very innovative feature of using delegates and sorting out the records in a generic list based on any property of the object in that list.


The following is the code sample for the same.





List SectionsList = SectionsListDataSourceObject;

SectionsList.Sort(

delegate(dataType dt1, dataType dt2)

{

return dt1.SortField.CompareTo(dt2.SortField);

});



You can use all types of fields to sort ranging from string, integer to dates, and you dont have to override any functionality. If you want to sort the records in descending order just reverse the pattern in the return statement. So that would be

return dt2.SortField.CompareTo(dt1.SortField);



Hope this saves someone quite a lot of frustration!

Thursday 3 April 2008

It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level.

One hell of an error I got while working with membership provider in my project. The error said something like "It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS."
Now this doesn't really help as an error message, but a quick googling got me some surprising scenarios where you can have this error. Surprising because, there were only two ways it can surface!

  1. When you create a new application and the IIS fails to configure, the virtual folder as an application. Now I seriously don't believe there are many geeky nerds, who actually create an application virtual folder manually (I don't want to be rude, but have'nt come across any!). Also no one creates even a folder into the application manually. Atleast I do it via Visual Studio. It is quick, efficient and prevents me to configure it properly in the IIS!
  2. The second scenario, is the one that is quite possible most of the time. When you have sub-directories in your application, you can have web.config for all the sub-directory nodes. You can configure, almost everything for that folder using that web.config, and it will override the settings, in the parent web.config. But saying that I must admit, there are certain properties which cannot be set in the web.config of the sub-directory.
Let me explain the second in detail here!

You cannot set the Authentication, Session State and a couple of other properties for the sub folder in the web.config at that levet. It must inherit those properties from the parent file in principle. This after careful thinking was pretty common sense to me. You cannot have an application that accepts Form authentication at the application level, and suddenly execute windows authentication in a sub folder. You can have it vice-versa though, but I think just as a precaution, and not making it scary and confusing for the developer, MS has configured the parser accordingly.

The good news is, that this is true only for Authentication, and not Authorization. You can configure authorization at folder level, because, you need to! For all those who are having this error, I have enclosed following solution to the problem.

You should have the authentication at the Application root level web.config under the <configuration>
<location path="ClientArea">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow roles="Clients"/>
<deny users="*"/>
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>

However, if you wish to have a web.config at the sub-directory level and protect the sub-directory, you can only specify the Authorization mode as follows:

<configuration>
<system.web>
<authorization>
<deny users="*"/>
</authorization>
</system.web>
</configuration>


Friday 25 January 2008

Visual studio 2008 professional edition

Hello all,
Today i have received a 90-day evaluation pack of visual
studio 2008 Professional edition. I have been reading a lot about the
said edition, and the latest and some cool features, it has to offer. I
think 90 days is too little a time for a professional like me, who
hardly has some time after coming from a long day at work, to try out
new things. But guess what, i have decided that i will spend atleast an
hour on the new version to make sure, i utilize the complete 90 days to
the maximum.
Will keep you all posted of anything cool, or may be any glitches from the new software.
So keep checking back, and till then chao!

Powered by ScribeFire.

Sunday 20 January 2008

Mix n match C# and VB codes in a single project

Got this wonderful stuff from http://www.aspnetlibrary.com

Whilst it isn't ideal to both mix C# and VB.NET languages in the same ASP.NET project, it is possible. The code still has to be separated and it can't be mixed at page level but you can create a class in each language and then use and reference them both from any page.

To do this, you'll need to follow a few simple steps.

Step 1

Create an App_Code folder if it doesn't already exist. Then, inside this folder create two other folders to hold each language type. For example,

App_Code
vbcode
cscode

Step 2

Edit your web.config file and make sure the following section is added:

<system.web>
<compilation>
<codeSubDirectories>
<add directoryName="vbcode"/>
<add directoryName="cscode"/>
</codeSubDirectories>
<compilation>
</system.web>

<system.web>
<compilation>
<codeSubDirectories>
<add directoryName="vbcode"/>
<add directoryName="cscode"/>
</codeSubDirectories>
</compilation>
</system.web>

Add each class to the relevant folder and you're done! You can now reference any of the classes in the standard manner and ASP.NET will do all of the compilation automatically for you.

Wednesday 16 January 2008

Distributed Transactions in MS SQL server 2005

I was developing a .net 2.0 web application with SQL 2000, and used TransactionScope. The machine had the access to database on server through LAN. Everything was working fine, and we had no problem. Then came the upgrade for the SQL server. We decide to roll out 2005 edition of MS SQL and this is where the problems started.
SQL 2005 does not by default allow distributed transactions, so if you are using nested transactions, which could be TransactionScope as well, it will bug up. After a bit of digging up, I found out following steps to get around this bug! So here they are.

First verify the "Distribute Transaction Coordinator" Service is running on both database server computer and client computers

1. Go to "Administrative Tools &gt; Services"
2. Turn on the "Distribute Transaction Coordinator" Service if it is not running

If it is running and client application is not on the same computer as the database server, on the computer running database server

1. Go to "Administrative Tools &gt; Component Services"
2. On the left navigation tree, go to "Component Services &gt; Computers &gt; My Computer" (you may need to double click and wait as some nodes need time to expand)
3. Right click on "My Computer", select "Properties"
4. Select "MSDTC" tab
5. Click "Security Configuration"
6. Make sure you check "Network DTC Access", "Allow Remote Client", "Allow Inbound/Outbound", "Enable TIP" (Some option may not be necessary, have a try to get your configuration)
7. The service will restart
8. BUT YOU MAY NEED TO REBOOT YOUR SERVER IF IT STILL DOESN'T WORK


On your client computer use the same above procedure to open the "Security Configuration" setting, make sure you check "Network DTC Access", "Allow Inbound/Outbound" option, restart service and computer if necessary.

On you SQL server service manager, click "Service" dropdown, select "Distribute Transaction Coordinator", it should be also running on your server computer.



Powered by ScribeFire.

Wednesday 21 November 2007

ASP.NET 3.5 has arrived

It has been less than a year, since I started working with ASP.NET, started with 1.1, using VB.NET and gradually getting hold of 2.0 using C#. I havent yet fully understood and implemented a single site in the so called technology, and here it comes!

On November 19, 2007 Microsoft officially released the ASP.NET version 3.5, and ushered the developers into the .NET 3.5 era. Enhancements have been released across the platform, which would now mean I have to be quick enough to embark on the technology or be left out.

As many of us would expect the changes or features in the new version are additive. Nothing has been taken off from the 2.0 version, and nothing has been drastically modified. Like people coming from ASP.net 1.1 to 2.0, it was a complete shock. Quite a few things have been taken off, many of things modified, and very little if not, new things added. But this time, it seems Microsoft has been considerate with the developers. In short, ASP.net 3.5 does'nt take away or change anythingor even break any functionality, concepts, or code present in 2.0 - it just adds new types and features and capabilities to the framework.

As you could have guessed it Visual Studio 2008 the Microsoft IDE(Integrated Developement Environment) is the recommended tool for developing the applications. Unlike the previous flavours of Visual Studio, this one can be used to develop applications using .net 1.1, 2.0, 3.0 as well as 3.5. So if you are not thinking of developing any new system, or upgrading your code at this moment of time, it would be wise decision to purchase Visual studio 2008, as it would support your older version of codes as well. It also includes some extra features such as improved Designer experience, JavaScript Debugging (Finally Microsoft got it in their heads!), and intellisense features; and the developers have the ability to view and even step into the core .NET framework code during debugging.

So in short, it would be really wonderful coding and even better experience in debugging the applications using the new system. I have got hold of a beta version of the Visual studio 2008. Will be playing with it in some times from now, and will keep you all posted.


Powered by ScribeFire.

The Internal Structure of .pdb Files

Whenever you are faced with an unknown data format, the first thing to do is to run some instances of it through a hex dump viewer. The w2k_dump.exe utility does a good job in this respect. Examining the hex dump of a Windows 2000 PDB file like ntoskrnl.pdb or ntfs.pdb reveals some interesting properties:
  • The file seems to be divided into blocks of fixed size—typically 0[ts]400 bytes.

  • Some blocks consist of long runs of 1-bits, occasionally interrupted by shorter sequences of 0-bits.

  • The information in the file is not necessarily contiguous. Sometimes, the data ends abruptly at a block boundary, but continues somewhere else in the file.

  • Some data blocks appear repeatedly within the file.

It took me some time until I finally realized that these are typical properties of a compound file. A compound file is a small file system packaged into a single file. The "file system" metaphor readily explains some of the above observations:

  • A file system subdivides a disk into sectors of fixed size, and groups the sectors into files of variable size. The sectors representing a file can be located anywhere on the disk and don't need to be contiguous—the file/sector assignments are defined in a file directory.

  • A compound file subdivides a raw disk file into pages of fixed size, and groups the pages into streams of variable size. The pages representing a file can be located anywhere in the raw disk file and don't need to be contiguous—the stream/page assignments are defined in a stream directory.

Obviously, almost any assertions about file systems can be mapped to compound files by simply replacing "sector" by "page", and "file" by "stream". The file system metaphor explains why a PDB file is organized in fixed-size blocks. It also explains why the blocks are not necessarily contiguous. What about the pages with the masses of 1-bits? Actually, this type of data is something very common in file systems. To keep track of used and unused sectors on the disk, many file systems maintain an allocation bit array that provides one bit for each sector (or sector cluster). If a sector is unused, its bit is set. Whenever the file system allocates space for a file, it searches for unused sectors by scanning the allocation bits. After adding a sector to a file, its allocation bit is set to zero. The same procedure is applied to the pages and streams of a compound file. The long runs of 1-bits represent unused pages, while the 0-bits are assigned to existing streams.

The only thing that is left now is the observation that some data blocks reoccur within a PDB file. The same thing happens with sectors on a disk. When a file in a file system is rewritten a couple of times, each write operation might use different sectors to store the data. Thus, it can happen that the disk contains free sectors with older duplicates of the file information. This doesn't constitute a problem for the file system. If the sector is marked free in the allocation bit array, it is unimportant what data it contains. As soon as the sector is reclaimed for another file, the data will be overwritten, anyway. Applying the file system metaphor once more to compound files, this means that the observed duplicate pages are usually left over from earlier versions of a stream that has been rewritten to different pages in the compound file. They can be safely ignored—all we have to care for are the pages that are referred to by the stream directory. The remaining unassigned pages should be regarded as garbage.

With the basic paradigm of PDB files being introduced now, we can step to the more interesting task of examining their basic building blocks. Listing 1 shows the layout of the PDB header. The PDB_HEADER starts with a lengthy signature that specifies the PDB version as a text string. The text is terminated with an end-of-file (EOF) character (ASCII code 0[ts]1A) and supplemented with the magic number 0[ts]0000474A, or "JG\0\0" if interpreted as a string. Maybe these are the initials of the designer of the PDB format. The embedded EOF character has the nice effect that an ignorant user can issue a command like type ntoskrnl.pdb in a console window without getting any garbage on the screen. The only thing that will be displayed is the message "Microsoft C/C++ program database 2.00\r\n". All Windows 2000 symbol files are shipped as PDB 2.00 files. Apparently, a PDB 1.00 format exists as well, but it seems to be structured quite differently.

Listing 1 The PDB File Header

#define PDB_SIGNATURE_200 \
"Microsoft C/C++ program database 2.00\r\n\x1AJG\0"

#define PDB_SIGNATURE_TEXT 40

// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

typedef struct _PDB_SIGNATURE
{
BYTE abSignature [PDB_SIGNATURE_TEXT+4]; // PDB_SIGNATURE_nnn
}
PDB_SIGNATURE, *PPDB_SIGNATURE, **PPPDB_SIGNATURE;

#define PDB_SIGNATURE_ sizeof (PDB_SIGNATURE)

// -----------------------------------------------------------------

#define PDB_STREAM_FREE -1

// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

typedef struct _PDB_STREAM
{
DWORD dStreamSize; // in bytes, -1 = free stream
PWORD pwStreamPages; // array of page numbers
}
PDB_STREAM, *PPDB_STREAM, **PPPDB_STREAM;

#define PDB_STREAM_ sizeof (PDB_STREAM)

// -----------------------------------------------------------------

#define PDB_PAGE_SIZE_1K 0x0400 // bytes per page
#define PDB_PAGE_SIZE_2K 0x0800
#define PDB_PAGE_SIZE_4K 0x1000

#define PDB_PAGE_SHIFT_1K 10 // log2 (PDB_PAGE_SIZE_*)
#define PDB_PAGE_SHIFT_2K 11
#define PDB_PAGE_SHIFT_4K 12

#define PDB_PAGE_COUNT_1K 0xFFFF // page number &lt; PDB_PAGE_COUNT_*
#define PDB_PAGE_COUNT_2K 0xFFFF
#define PDB_PAGE_COUNT_4K 0x7FFF

// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

typedef struct _PDB_HEADER
{
PDB_SIGNATURE Signature; // PDB_SIGNATURE_200
DWORD dPageSize; // 0x0400, 0x0800, 0x1000
WORD wStartPage; // 0x0009, 0x0005, 0x0002
WORD wFilePages; // file size / dPageSize
PDB_STREAM RootStream; // stream directory
WORD awRootPages []; // pages containing PDB_ROOT
}
PDB_HEADER, *PPDB_HEADER, **PPPDB_HEADER;

#define PDB_HEADER_ sizeof (PDB_HEADER)

Following the signature at offset 0[ts]2C is a DWORD named dPageSize that specifies the size of the compound file pages in bytes. Legal values are 0[ts]0400 (1KB), 0[ts]0800 (2KB), and 0[ts]1000 (4KB). The wFilePages member reflects the total number of pages used by the PDB file image. Multiplying this value by the page size should always exactly match the file size in bytes. wStartPage is a zero-based page number that points to the first data page. The byte offset of this page can be computed by multiplying the page number by the page size. Typical values are 9 for 1KB pages (byte offset 0[ts]2400), 5 for 2KB pages (byte offset 0[ts]2800), or 2 for 4KB pages (byte offset 0[ts]2000). The pages between the PDB_HEADER and the first data page are reserved for the allocation bit array of the compound file, always starting at the beginning of the second page. This means that the PDB file maintains 0[ts]2000 bytes with 0[ts]10000 allocation bits if the page size is 1 or 2KB, and 0[ts]1000 bytes with 0[ts]8000 allocation bits if the page size is 4KB. In turn, this implies that the maximum amount of data a PDB file can manage is 64MB in 1KB page mode, and 128MB in 2KB or 4KB page mode.

The RootStream and awRootPages[] members concluding the PDB_HEADER describe the location of the stream directory within the PDB file. As already noted, the PDB file is conceptually a collection of variable-length streams that carry the actual data. The locations and compositions of the streams are managed in a single stream directory. Funny as it might seem, the stream directory itself is stored in a stream. I have called this very special stream the "root stream". The root stream holding the stream directory can be located anywhere in the PDB file. Its location and size are supplied by the RootStream and awRootPages[] members of the PDB_HEADER. The dStreamSize member of the PDB_STREAM substructure specifies the number of pages occupied by the stream directory, and the entries in the awRootPages[] array point to the pages containing the data.

The stream directory is composed of two sections: A header part in the form of a PDB_ROOT structure, as defined in Listing 2, and a data part consisting of an array of 16-bit page numbers. The wCount member of the PDB_ROOT section specifies the number of streams stored in the PDB compound file. The aStreams[] array contains a PDB_STREAM entry (see Listing 1) for each stream, and the page number slots follow immediately after the last aStreams[] entry.

Listing 2 The PDB Stream Directory

#define PDB_STREAM_DIRECTORY 0
#define PDB_STREAM_PDB 1
#define PDB_STREAM_PUBSYM 7

// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

typedef struct _PDB_ROOT
{
WORD wCount; // &lt; PDB_STREAM_MAX
WORD wReserved; // 0
PDB_STREAM aStreams []; // stream #0 reserved for stream table
}
PDB_ROOT, *PPDB_ROOT, **PPPDB_ROOT;

#define PDB_ROOT_ sizeof (PDB_ROOT)

Finding the page number block associated to a given stream is somewhat tricky because the page directory doesn't provide any cues except the stream size. If you are interested in stream #3, you have to compute the number of pages occupied by streams #1 and #2 to get the desired start index within the page number array. Once the stream's page number list is located, reading the stream data is simple. Just walk through the list and multiply each page number by the page size to yield the file offset, and read pages from the computed offsets until the end of the stream is reached. Isn't it funny: On first sight, parsing a PDB file seemed rather tough. Now it turns out that it is actually quite simple—probably much simpler than parsing a .dbg file. The compound-file nature of the PDB format with its clear-cut random access to stream pages reduces the task of reading a stream to a mere concatenation of fixed-sized pages. I'm really amazed at this elegant data access mechanism!

An even greater benefit of the PDB format becomes apparent if it comes to updating an existing PDB file. Inserting data into a file with a sequential structure usually means reshuffling large portions of the contents. The PDB file's random-access structure borrowed from file systems allows addition and deletion of data with minimal effort, just like files can be modified with ease on a file system media. Only the stream directory has to be reshuffled at times when a stream grows or shrinks across a page boundary. This important property facilitates incremental updating of PDB files. As Microsoft puts it in a Knowledge Base article titled "INFO: PDB and DBG Files—What They Are and How They Work":

"The .PDB extension stands for 'program database.' It holds the new format for storing debugging information that was introduced in Visual C++ version 1.0. In the future, the .PDB file will also hold other project state information. One of the most important motivations for the change in format was to allow incremental linking of debug versions of programs, a change first introduced in Visual C++ version 2.0." (Microsoft Knowledge Base, article Q121366)

Now that the internal format of PDB files is clear, the next problem is to identify the contents of their streams. After examining various PDB files, I have come to the conclusion that each stream number serves a predefined purpose. For example, the first stream seems to always contain a stream directory, and the second one contains information about the PDB file that can be used to verify that the file matches an associated .dbg file. For example, the latter stream contains dSignature and dAge members that should have the same values as the corresponding members of an NB10 CodeView section. The eighth stream is most interesting in the context of this chapter because it hosts the CodeView symbol information we have been searching for. The meaning of the other streams is still unclear to me and constitutes another vast area for future research.

I am not going to include PDB reader sample code here because this would exceed the scope of this article without being rather interesting. You already know this program—it is the w2k_dump.exe utility that I have used to create some of the hex dump examples above. This simple console-mode utility provides a +p command line option that enables PDB stream decomposition. If the specified file is not a valid PDB file, the program falls back to sequential hex dump mode.



Powered by ScribeFire.